In-game tweeting vs. in-game talking

The NBA is reportedly putting together a social media policy that bans in-game tweeting.

I'm fine with putting a gag on players talking to the media during games. But a Twitter ban would send an inconsistent message. The league lets TV sideline reporters interview coaches and players during the game. In fact, it requires coaches to participate in these on-camera interviews.

Talking to a TV reporter is okay. But bypassing the journalists to tweet directly to fans is not okay.

Is this to protect the relationship with the TV stations that are paying money to broadcast the games? Or is the NBA scared of mobile phone and Internet technology?

Update: Texas Tech University has banned its football players from having Twitter pages.

Comments

Josh said…
Texas Tech is a public school, isn't it? There's no WAY that would withstand a court challenge!
dl004d said…
Really? Then how can coaches ban certain players from talking to reporters? The school controls media availabilities.
Josh said…
I'm not saying they can't pass rules. I'm saying the rules wouldn't stand up in court.

Popular posts from this blog

Incumbents didn't stand a chance

USC goes commando

Paperweights have become paperweights