
I've always thought
USC cheerleaders were pretty classy (to the extent that such a classification is possible in the cheerleading world). They wear long-sleeved white turtlenecks, rather than the skimpy tops donned by most cheerleading teams.
But yesterday I discovered that a USC Song Girl named Megan Ramer
doesn't wear underwear.
Britney Spears, are you responsible for this?
Comments
Not out of the fantasies of many men last night though, I'm guessing.
Thongs are the playthings of the devil. There was no reason for them to be invented, other than praying on women's fear of VPL.
I have hated them even before dl004d and I dated (or were married for that matter).
Sexy on women? Not in and of themselves, though what they reveal can sometimes be sexy... but then I'm an atypical guy, since I tend to like flannel PJs better than most lingerie out there.
As for etymology: I learned the full term as an "undie-grundie," as in: "Hey, watch me give Dave an undie-grundie."
Okay, one of you has to update this entry to include the "grundy."
I like variety so while the USC cheer girls look great, the Army girls with their leg warmers on don't take a back seat to them:
http://tinyurl.com/yqklrt